Earlier this year, I read Metalion: The Slayer Mag Diaries by Jon Kristiansen. The book is a solid testament to the Second Wave of Black Metal in Norway during the late ’80s and early ’90s, but while the zines themselves are incredibly evocative of a reality that may no longer exist in metal, the written chapters in between the photocopied pages are the book’s most valuable assets. These are the confessions of a player in what is now a cultural myth, expressing the disillusionment and intensity (and sure, the drunkenness and poverty) that helped gestate something that many of us find incomprehensible–an unequivocal rejection of life, light, and happiness. But while reading about the major events in this movement, the one that always stops me in my tracks is the life and suicide of Morbid and Mayhem frontman Per Ohlin, known to many by his stage name Dead.
Unlike that of many of his contemporaries, Dead’s darkness was pure. As a child in Sweden, he had a near-death experience caused by a ruptured spleen, which Ohlin claimed was the result of an ice-skating accident but his brother later attributed to a beating by schoolyard bullies. This brush with death left him depressed, introverted, and obsessed with dying. If the stories are to be believed, Ohlin’s original communication with Mayhem came in the form of a package containing a letter, a demo tape, and a crucified mouse. Dead was the real deal—he would cut himself onstage, bury his clothes to make them cerements of the grave, huff a dead crow he kept in a jar to get the scent of decay in his nostrils. He’s credited as the first black metal musician to wear corpse paint. Then, in the house he lived in with Mayhem guitarist and black metal svengali Oystein “Euronymous” Aarseth, Dead slit his wrists and throat before shooting himself in the head with a shotgun. His suicide note famously included the phrase, “Excuse all the blood.” Upon finding him, the legend goes, Euronymous made necklaces with pieces of Ohlin’s skull and a stew with bits of his brains. That Aarseth photographed the body is undisputed—a picture of Ohlin’s corpse graces the Mayhem bootleg Dawn of the Black Hearts.
The importance of Ohlin’s death is indescribable. Obviously, the Norwegian black metal movement came about through a great number of albums, personalities, and circumstances, but before Per Ohlin joined Mayhem they were a thrash band from Norway; with him on board they were a cultural landmark, synonymous with corporeal morbidity and the unstoppable darkness within every soul (and pig’s heads). His depression, which often alarmed and upset those around him, was a justification of the whole black metal aesthetic, because fuck, man, if someone like Per Ohlin existed, so wrapped up in his own demise that he’d gash his arm with a broken bottle at parties, then maybe this world was the Hell all the songs claimed it was—what else could birth a soul like that of Dead? But while his life was powerful, his suicide was monumental, both solidifying his role as Mayhem’s greatest frontman and driving home Euronymous’ so-desperately-desired image of the Satanic overlord unconcerned with decency or humanity.
Reading about Dead’s life and death makes Euronymous, often considered the martyred father of black metal, look like a real piece of shit. Never mind pilfering Ohlin’s corpse—many players in the movement have described how Euronymous not only allowed Dead to mutilate himself, but also encouraged these tendencies. Some even speculate that Aarseth, well versed in Dead’s mental anguish, left the singer alone in a house containing a shotgun in the hopes that he would commit suicide. All speculation aside, an undeniable fact is that when it came to acting “true,” Euronymous had nothing on Dead, and more so that he used Dead’s instability as a tool for his own mythology. Maybe this wasn’t entirely on Aarseth—Dead obviously gave a shit about how he was perceived, and was finally responsible for his own death—but one can’t help but wonder what the fuck Euronymous was thinking, or if he ever cared about his singer. From what I’ve read, Aarseth was a charismatic figure who could easily have discouraged Ohlin from self-slaughter. Euronymous himself didn’t want to die, made evident by how he fled during his murder. So maybe he wanted this genuine article to be sacrificed to his scene. In a letter reprinted in Peter Beste’s True Norwegian Black Metal, Euronymous claims that Dead committed suicide because the poser-riddled scene disgusted him, rewriting history to make his friend’s tragedy justify his existence.
Then again, those around Dead seem to think he was pretty intent on dying. Bard Eithun of Emperor said, “Honestly, I don’t think he was enjoying living in this world.” One wonders if anything could have been done to save Ohlin. Maybe he needed to go home—Sweden is a very different country from Norway, less frigid and cut-throat, and though Dead was already mutilating rodents in Sweden, maybe he would have been comfortable enough there to weather the storm. Or maybe it was Scandinavia as a whole—in Metalion, Kristiansen describes going to Australia as an eye-opening experience, full of warm, uninhibited people. Maybe Ohlin needed to go somewhere with sunny beaches and open plains to soothe his torment; a month in Greece could have saved Dead. Maybe he just needed those around him to show him more love, though given how well the survivors of the Second Wave speak of him he probably received plenty. Hell, maybe he needed medication and therapy, practices I feel conflicted about. What if Ohlin had someone to talk to entirely divorced from the scene? But all these maybes and ifs mean nothing. Had Dead been saved from or grown out of his abject misery, black metal would not have exploded the way it did. I would not feel as touched by his story, and this article would go unwritten.
That, finally, is the tragedy of Per Ohlin’s death—how much we owe him. Dead’s suicide created black metal as we know it, the perfect mixture of disharmonious music and absolute seriousness of attitude. Interestingly, Dead’s obsessions always leaned more towards the vast cold of the void rather than the glory of Satan, and this only makes him more genuine than many of the genre’s artists. Norse Satanism is steeped in the state-sponsored Christianity it rejects, finding solace in a punk-ish Anti-Your-Thing quality backed by grandiose and bestial imagery. Dead didn’t didn’t stand in opposition to everyday life, he felt foreign to it, and sought a realm where his overwhelming urges weren’t trapped in a veil of meat and emotion. That’s what black metal is, at its heart—a deep, violent revolt against the boundaries of one’s reality, the scream from the mouth of a person who has realized that they do, in fact, have a soul. In black metal, I see magical rebellion against society, but in Per Ohlin I see something more, a spirit who forsook the uncomfortable prison of living and leapt into a freezing ocean ahead of him, where he could disappear like a single drop among rolling black waves.
. . .
[Editor's Note: Scab Casserole is a metal journalist for Invisible Oranges. He has never been to Scandinavia or spoken at any length to any member of the Norwegian black metal scene.]


br>
Well then Varg was right from the beginning how Euronymous was a piece of shit who just wanted to seem so evil and true, but in reality was nothing but a person who lived on the glory and courage of others. but then one can’t deny his impact on Black Metal.
Count Grishnackh after so many years people are starting to believe you, although now you are busy with your true Norwegian RPG game.
“Well then Varg was right from the beginning how Euronymous was a piece of shit who just wanted to seem so evil and true, but in reality was nothing but a person who lived on the glory and courage of others.”
I’m not sure where exactly you’re getting this from? This article is merely musings and thoughts on the issue, not actual evidence for or against any member of the scene.
Heck, it even says pretty boldly – “Scab Casserole is a metal journalist for Invisible Oranges. He has never been to Scandinavia or spoken at any length to any member of the Norwegian black metal scene.”
So it is essentially an opinion piece bsed around someone’s interpretation of what they perceive as Euronymous’ actions and interactions with Ohlin. It’s not really “evidence” that supports Varg’s statements one way or another.
“I’m not sure where exactly you’re getting this from?”
[Lords of Chaos] the book in which there are several interviews with Varg, where he states these things about Euronymous.There are many who say that he was homosexual (not that there’s anything wrong with that)
hey repeats this several times in Until The Light Takes Us as well, he says Euronymous attempted to position himself as a figurehead of the movement and rest on the laurels of everyone else’s actions
Oh I know LoC well, and it’s a pretty sensationalist accounts of things to be honest.
But that’s neither here nor there – Varg’s views on Euronymous are well known and well documented.
The point I was going for was that there’s nothing in this article which makes Varg’s opinion more or less “right”.
There’s nothing here that is “evidence” per se, so it’s difficult for me to see how this article equates to “Varg was right from the beginning”.
On the one hand, I sort of feel sorry for Euronymous. He was basically a huge metal nerd who got carried away with his own image and pretty much paid the price for it. On the other hand, putting out a press release claiming that Dead killed himself because he was sick of all of the trendy posers in the metal scene just makes me wanna slap the corpsepaint right off his face – or worse, introduce him to Hunter Hunt-Hendrix.
Poor Dead. All accounts make him seem like basically a good dude who was really sad and isolated, and music’s poorer for his absence. His vocals, along with Euronymous’ guitar playing, were huge parts of Mayhem’s sound, and thus a huge part of black metal’s emerging aesthetic.
I always thought this quote from him in Lords of Chaos was very interesting:
I had a weird experience once. I had inner bleeding and it couldn’t be found at X-rays so when it continued to bleed and bleed I finally fainted and dropped down to the floor cos I run out of blood. The heart had no blood left to beat and my veins/arteries almost emptied of blood. “Technically” I was dead. At that moment when I fell down (into a door, I heard later), I saw a strange blue color everywhere – it was transparent so I could for a short moment see everything in blue, till something shining white and “hot” surrounded me
… it’s someone I know who’s had many out-of-body experiences and knows much more than I do about “supernatural” experience, that I asked this cos it was so strange about those colors. She told me that the first “plane” in the astral world has the color blue. The earthly plane has the color of black. Then comes a gray that is very near the earthly one and is easy to come to. The next one further is blue, then it gets brighter and brighter till it “stops” at a white shining one that can’t be entered by mortals. If any mortal succeeds in entering it, that one is no longer mortal and can not come back to the earthly planes nor back to this earth. After the white plane… it goes further with other colors that I don’t know of – there only spirits and great sorcerers can travel. I was told that the white plane I then entered, without knowing it, was the deadworld, and I had died.
Also, check him out in this Candlemass video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3uvf0cn0jo
That Candlemass video is fucking aces. There is Dead’s presence of course. Then there is the magical appearance of snow from one scene to the next. So bad, so awesome.
Liked your story much better than the one about the dead dude.
All hail the living!
David
Why you respect Dead’s trueness for killing himself and then try to judge Euronymous by some conventional morality for not being a good buddy? Maybe not being a good buddy is an authentic act of evil, not a pose. Maybe only a poser would try to be an agent of Satan while still maintaining that side of himself that is not “a piece of shit.”
and the award for most asinine argument of the day goes to…
Euronymous never believed any of that stuff it was all a publicity stunt. That’s the reason he never actively involved himself in the church burnings even though he encouraged others to do so. It’s also one of the reasons him and Varg fell out since Varg saw him as a fake and a poser.
I really wonder if Dr Phil could have helped him.
I think Goeffrey from Game of Thrones would have thrived in early 90’s Norway
he was only 22 when he died. He was a child. Having a morbid fascination with death and darkness is quite a normal thing for an angst ridden teen. He took it one step further into schlocky shock jock performance art. His lyrics were again, angsty and horror/fantasy inspired and not particularly revelatory. Dead was no great black metal founder or prophet.
The problem with black metal is that a group of people has concocted its own mythology from the ashes of what should have been a shortlived scene. This scene in itself was comprised of a handful of awkward kids from Scandinavia, who whilst they did – clumsily and accidentally – hit upon a novel set of aesthetics in metal, would have been an insignificant side show if it werent for a handful of individuals branching out into violent and cowardly crime and raising it’s profile.
Per’s life was a tragedy. I also agree that Euronymous probably was an asshole. A lot of his attributed comments and actions at the time can be ascribed to bullshit bravado and he certainly never professed any feelings of loss about the death of his friend.
I am fascinated by all this stuff of course, but it’s important that people don’t get carried away. It’s not about Satanism, it’s a naive nihilism fuelled by raging teenage hormones.
This is how many people perceive heavy metal in general. In fact I don’t think I’m off base saying this is how *most* people perceive heavy metal in general.
OH GOLLY I WAS JUST WONDERING WHEN SOMEONE WOULD BRING UP THIS CONSTANTLY OVERLOOKED ISSUE. IT HAS BEEN SO LONG SINCE I’VE SEEN ANY COVERAGE OF THIS TRULY INTERESTING STORY THAT I HAD FORGOTTEN IT EVEN EXISTED. THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE WORLD NEEDS.
Had he lived he would now be an accountant in Oslo.
he’d still probably kill himself doing that, let’s be honest
He’d probably be a model for Anti Sweden.
Is accounting that bad?
He would suffer so many paper cuts. #20 white paper slices as fine as razor blades.
Interesting piece, but based as it is entirely on other previous writing it’s difficult not to think the entire perspective here has been shaped by others from the very beginning.
What I think this article, and the ensuing comments, really get at is the impossibility of separating the personal trials, see Dead’s obvious mental issues and the black metal “scene,” and process, see the recordings and Dead’s burying of clothes and huffing from dead animals, that went into creating the music and the music itself, which later has to stand on its own, while also standing in for that lost-to-time trials and process that have now become folklore all their own.
Steve, I was really hoping you were gonna say that you and Dead and Euronymous have been chilling in the afterlife, maybe share a funny anecdote or something.
I’m disappointed.
lol, and fuck you steve jobs my ipod is crapping out on me man!!!
This is a meaningless and completely unnecessary article on par with Wikipedia discussion speculation and Metal Archives birth date edit wars. The Dunning-Kruger effect in full bloom. Wondering aloud whether or not Øystein Aarseth was a bad guy or if a sunny vacation could have saved the life of a person you know next to nothing about, how is this constructive? Why write something like this?
Usually dig Scab’s stuff, but this piece seems a little too speculative and a little unnecessary for me. True, it presents some interesting thoughts on the matter, but . . . again, too speculative. One of the first things you learn in Psychology is to not make fundamental attribution errors, and I think that’s exactly what this piece does, and for many different parties, not just on Dead’s behalf. Still, sophisticated and erudite writing about Metal is always a pleasure to read. Keep it up, Scab. You’re one of this site’s very best.
Also, I’ve never seen “Until the Light Takes Us,” but I do love “Hvis Lyset Tar Oss.”
This is a great piece of writing on an aspect of a musical genre that still fascinates me to this day …
Was it Rolling Stone who required (or still requires?) prospective writers to submit an article about Black Sabbath as part of their job application? The idea is that they only want writers who can say something interesting about a well-documented subject.
The subject of the Second Wave has become like that within the metal sphere. And I’d say this is mostly a success, but I still must agree with Doomed to Repeat above. There’s nothing new you can say about the subject without speculation, and the speculation is interesting, and the article well-written. But still, Rolling Stone doesn’t print all those Black Sabbath articles.
I want to add that I still expect every metal site to touch on this now and again, but this very site has talked about it a hell of a lot–as recently as September, there was an article dedicated to it.
I doubt Rolling Stone does that. Their early reviews of Sabbath were savage; they dropped the ball on Dio’s passing and they buried Iommi on their greatest guitarist list. If you want to read a glowing 5,000 word profile of Jennifer Lawrence or Zack Effron then step on up. Most prospective RS writers are probably big Ani DeFranco fans.
After researching it, it wasn’t RS, it was something called Trebuchet Magazine (link). However, RS has changed their tune on Sabbath, so to speak.
haha, RS was, what, 30+ years behind the ball on Sabbath?
I occasionally see people my age (~30) on the subway reading it and laugh. it’s one of the few times I don’t feel like an asshole for laughing at someone’s poor judgment.
I continually get RS subscriptions for free whenever I buy a ticket through Ticketmaster. A new issue arrives, I flip through it dumbfounded, constantly asking myself “WHO READS THIS?”.
The review section has withered to a fraction of its original size; now it’s just mainstream pop/rock rubbing shoulders with the few indie bands that float to the top. Bon Jovi next to Bon Iver, basically.
It’s easy to praise all these guys now who, back then, were a bunch of losers with little else to do than act evil and play music no one liked. Underground credibility was gained over hype, rumors and gossip. The music played very little if you count ‘De Mysteriis’ out of the picture. I would side with Varg on this.
Fuck all this shit–grab Fenriz for an interview. At least that would be funny AND entertaining unlike this spew.
My interpretation of Euronymous’ behavior is this: He was creating a stage persona. The same way Gene Simmons doesn’t expect us to believe he wears facepaint and breathes fire in his daily life, Euronymous didn’t expect us to believe that he was truly a nihilist or evil or generally practiced what he preached. Or, if he did want us to think that, it was to be cool (admit it, that’s a cool persona) and he surely didn’t ACTUALLY practice what he preached. When he said that Dead committed suicide because of posers, he was advancing the band’s image (in an insensitive and slandering way). He was branding himself and the band, and there’s nothing wrong with that.
His mistake was getting people to believe that the music and the philosophy were inseparable. Many BM artists hold strongly to personal philosophies, true, some elements of which are held commonly amongst BM artists, especially in the early scene. But remember, it was/is a musical scene. Not a religion. Not a cohesive philosophy. Not something that can be “true” (god, I hate when people actually say that).
To say that Dead was truer to the BM philosophy because he killed himself, while Euronymous wouldn’t even LET himself be murdered when he had the chance (really?) is nonsense. Let’s not hold musicians to a standard of whether or not they’ll literally die to prove their allegiance to a philosophy that IS separable from the music.
Dead killed himself because he was depressed and likely ill, not to prove a point. Euronymous didn’t kill himself or huff dead animals because he was a real person who likely wasn’t ill and didn’t feel the need to live up to outrageous, destructive standards placed on him due to the way he chose to brand his band. Varg killed Euronymous because he’s a lunatic.
Maybe I misinterpreted the points made in this piece, so correct me if I’m hollering about nothing to no one.
This one I would like to comment on.
I don’t think Dead killed himself to make a point, I think he killed himself because he was mentally ill and depressed. That’s what most strikes me about the story of the Second Wave of Black Metal–this poor fucking kid. He wasn’t truer to the BM philosophy because he killed himself, nor was he really a proponent of “the philosophy.” He was “grim” in practice, before the concepts of “grimness” or “kult” or “the black metal philosophy” even existed. Per was just being Per, and that changed everything, whether or not he was sick (which, I agree, he was). That’s why I call his suicide, and how much we owe to it, a tragedy. I wonder if this whole musical scene was worth this poor sad dude’s life.
More so, I disagree with your statements on Euronymous. It’s one thing to brand your band by saying you have a grafted cow’s tongue or whatever; it’s thing another entirely to do it on the memory of someone who was supposedly was your friend. I also think he could’ve done some things to stop his friend’s suicide. It’s one thing to say “KILL YOURSELF!” to your dickhead friends as you laugh over beers, but it’s another thing entirely to say such a thing when your friend is really, truly suicidally depressed. Your point is that Euronymous was a real person, and mine is just that he was a really shitty one, that he could have helped his singer but didn’t. At the very least, it’s an egregious sin of omission.
Ah! My last comment, under this, was supposed to be a reply to you.
Dude, if you’ve read the stories correctly Varg killed Euronymous because Euronymous was going to kill him and Varg knew it. Euronymous is the sick lunatic here, he took pictures of Dead’s corpse and even RE-ARRANGED the tools he used to kill himself. Correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s fucking messed up man. And the fact that he used Dead’s suicide to bring publicity for the band’s image is sickening and demented.
I get what you’re saying about Dead, and I agree. He probably believed what his music was about more than most musicians. That’s commendable for any musician, but in this case also tragic. I didn’t really think that you specifically were saying he killed himself to make a point. My whole comment was reacting to you, other commenters, and completely unrelated things, just to get my whole argument out.
If what you read about Euronymous is true, then yeah, he was probably an asshole. But I have a hard time believing that he took his asshole-ery to the point where he avoided helping his troubled friend. It’s even harder to believe that he would antagonize Dead’s troubles with any level of intention to advance the image of the band. It’s hard to believe (especially as a fan), but certainly not impossible. I guess I’m just calling the content of Metalion or peoples’ analysis of Euronymous’ words and actions into question.
I seriously think Euronymous killed Dead, even his bandmates were suspicious about it
btw anyone interested in Dead’s life and his beliefs should definetely check some interviews with him from the zines of the old days
some of them can be found here
http://deadfrommayhem.ru/pages/en/interview.html
I felt pity for Per. He hadn’t experienced true happiness in life. He died unhappy,lonely and depressed in this world. And there’s no mentioning that he got involved in a romantic relationship. So sad he hadn’t experienced one.