![]() |
Metal Grammar School is in session! It’s time to stop polluting the world with improper grammar and spelling. Here are eight of metalheads’ most common mistakes. An American education need not be a disability. Educational reform starts right here, right now.
- – -
Could of / Could have / Would of / Would have
“Could of” and “would of” are not valid constructions.
If I could have, I would have saved Cliff’s life.
Its / It’s
Its = possessive adjective
It’s = “It is” or “It was”It’s a shame that band lost its bassist.
Lay / Lie
When used as verbs, these are frequently confused. “Lay” usually requires an object. “Lie” usually doesn’t. One lays something somewhere. One lies down, or lies to get out of trouble. The past tense of “lie” depends on its meaning.
Barry Bonds lied in court. Then he lay down for a nap.
Barry Bonds laid his cap down before lying down for a nap.
Lose / Loose
“Lose” is a verb usually requiring an object. One loses things, like weight or a game. “Loose” is usually an adjective meaning “not tight” (or “of lax morals”).
Lose the keyboards, man. They have no place in metal.
I liked the loose feel of that jam session.
Their / There / They’re
Their = possessive plural adjective
There = various parts of speech; most denote location
They’re = “They are” or “They were”Their riffs were strong.
Put those riffs there, before the chorus.
They’re the best riffs I’ve heard in years.
To / Too / Two
To = preposition
Too = “Also”
Two = “1+1″ (also, ill-advised Rob Halford project)Take these two packages to him. Oh, and this book, too.
Who’s / Whose
Who’s = “Who is” or “Who was”
Whose = possessive pronounWho’s the idiot who wrote these lyrics?
Whose lyrics are these?
Your / You’re
Your = adjective meaning “belonging to you”
You’re = “You are” or “You were”You’re in deep trouble when your spouse comes back.


and don't forget my favorite one, there is no such thing as "first annual". that runs in ads in decibel and on tv all the time.
I'm sure that more than a few articles have also used everyones favorite word, irregardless.
krabathor hates you
"If you are a false, do not entry!"
- Sarcofago
I feel like I'm back in high school again. Oh wait…
it's and its seems to be the most improperly used ones out of your list, although if you want to challenge your patience with metal heads, do not sign up to bravewords.com's messageboards…
Don't forget about the double negatives…
Cosmo,
Don't get me started.
i am the black wizards!
"News of Unslayer returning to their older sound PEAKED my interest"
No one ever gets this word right. It's gotten to the point where I've tried to reason that the writers actually intend to use peak, rather than pique. But then I've seen a few try to use PEEK too.
Here's another one:
"Getting my hair did." Really? So you get there and it is already done?
Since you mentioned Two, Cosmo, here's them, LIVE FROM THE VERY METAL FIELDS OF WISCONSIN!!!! Enjoy.
Oops, forgot to post that link.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VSa_VfrfoA
ben – The propriety of "first annual" depends on how one interprets "annual." If it means "intended to repeat yearly," as opposed to "demonstrably repeating yearly," then I don't see a problem.
bacon – That was one of the cheesiest assemblages of people I've ever seen on a stage.
i, too, don't see a problem with "first annual" since it only predicates events to come, though i can see how it sounds a little too assumptive.
one of my favorite misspellings i see quite often is the word "poser" instead of "poseur". considering it's such an elitist term to begin with, you'd think people would bother to spel it rite.
i would also love to eradicate the phrase "that being said" from everyone's language. it has to be the single most redundant phrase in existence but i see used it all the time.
I am chomping at the bit to read more pedantic comments.
Your post begs the question, "How ignorant am I!"
I would love to log into your website using my PIN number…
its sad that youve had too right an artical like this. lol.
THANK YOU!!!
Another one I see a lot is people typing "dominate" when they mean "dominant."
I see "definitely" spelled incorrectly all the time too (there is no "A" in that word, goddammit).
Another HUGE pet-peeve: incorrect use of "less" vs. "fewer." I don't know why non-count/count nouns are so fucking hard for people to understand.
And then of course, there are the hypercorrections. This seems to happen frequently with "I/me," as in "Claire gave both Morty and I a rimjob, then made us each a sandwich (she put fewer mayonnaise on his but less pickles on mine)."
Etc, etc.
Another sigh-of-hate-inducing blunder: use of "was" vs "were."
EUH….. I'm a french speaking Qu
I give this article my post-modernist stamp of approval.
I know it isn't a case of confused homophones, but while we're bitching about grammar and usage the phrase "between you and I" deserves special contempt. There are few things more hilariously aggravating than witnessing someone completely botching the objective case while attempting in vain to sound educated. Also, Barney Greenway needs a slap on the wrist for the song title "Passive Tense" off Time Waits for No Slave. It's the passive voice, man, the passive voice.
Fifteen years in the making: Ad I am the black wizards, if would-be pedants took the time to actually read the fucking lyrics to the song they would most likely realize rather quickly that old Mortiis did intend the plural wizard and it does make sense inside the context.
But hey; why be arsed?
hmmm…It's actually "champing" at the bit!
http://www.langston.com/English/